Comms Foundations Index
A single index of your organisation's canonical communications foundation documents: what exists, where it lives, who owns it and when it was last reviewed. The reference layer every project and every AI prompt should draw from.
What it is
The Comms Foundations Index is the contents page for your communications function. It lists the foundational documents that should underpin everything you produce: your positioning, your message house, your audience profiles, your brand voice, your AI use principles, and anything else your team treats as a standing reference.
Most teams have at least some of these documents. The problem is rarely that they do not exist; it is that they live in different drives, different formats and different states of repair, so people start from scratch instead of from the agreed position. The Index fixes that. It says, in one place: here is what we have agreed, here is where it lives, here is who keeps it current, and here is when we last checked it.
It is also the document that gives this whole layer a future. As Comms With AI develops, an index like this becomes the thing your tools can read: the set of foundations that a planning tool draws on so its output reflects your real positions, not a generic guess. Building the index now, even as a simple document, is the first step toward foundations that actively inform your work rather than sitting in a folder.
When to use it
Use this template when:
- Your foundation documents are scattered and people keep reinventing positions that already exist
- You are starting a new project and want it grounded in agreed foundations from the first day
- You are bringing in a new team member, freelancer or agency who needs your established positions fast
- You want a single, current reference that both people and AI tools can rely on
Don’t use this template when:
- You have not yet created the underlying foundations (start with the Comms Foundations Playbook toolkit; the Index records what you build)
Inputs needed
- A quick audit of what foundation documents exist and where they are stored
- A named owner for each one, so it is clear who keeps it current
- Honest last-reviewed dates, and honest gaps where a document is missing or stale
The template
Comms Foundations Index
Organisation: [Name] Maintained by: [Name and role] Last updated: [Date] Review cadence: [e.g. reviewed quarterly]
Core foundations
The documents most communications work should reference. Fill in the location, owner and status for each. Mark anything you do not yet have as “Missing” so the gap is visible.
| Foundation | What it covers | Document / link | Owner | Last reviewed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positioning statement | Who we are, what we do, why we are different | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
| Message house | Core message, supporting pillars, proof points | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
| Key messages grid | Messages adapted by audience and channel | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
| Audience profiles | Who we communicate with and what they care about | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
| Brand voice and tone | How we sound, and how we do not | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
| AI use principles | Our foundational stance on AI in comms | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
| Proof points bank | Evidence that backs our claims | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
Supporting foundations (optional)
Add any others your team treats as standing references.
| Foundation | What it covers | Document / link | Owner | Last reviewed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boilerplate and approved descriptions | Standard org descriptions, sign-offs | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
| Spokespeople and quote bank | Approved voices and quotable lines | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
| Visual identity references | Logo, colour, image guidance | [Link] | [Owner] | [Date] | Current / Stale / Missing |
| [Add your own] |
Gaps and priorities
List the foundations that are missing or stale, and the order you will address them.
| Gap | Why it matters | Priority (H/M/L) | Owner | Target date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
How to use this index
[A short note for your team: that new project folders should start by linking the relevant foundations from this index; that AI prompts should be grounded in these documents rather than improvised positions; and that anyone spotting a stale foundation should flag it to the owner.]
AI prompt
Base prompt
I'm building a Comms Foundations Index for my communications team: a single list of our canonical foundation documents with owners and review status.
Here is what I know we have, and where it lives:
[LIST what exists, e.g. "Positioning doc in SharePoint; message house in a 2024 deck; no documented brand voice; informal AI use, no principles written down"]
Please:
1. Organise this into a clear index of core and supporting foundations
2. Flag which standard comms foundations appear to be missing or out of date
3. Suggest a sensible priority order for closing the gaps, with a one-line reason for each
4. Recommend an owner type (role, not name) for each foundation
Be practical and concise. I want a usable index and a short to-do list, not a lecture.
Prompt variations
Variation 1: Grounding a new project
Here is our Comms Foundations Index:
[PASTE INDEX]
I'm starting a new project: [DESCRIBE PROJECT]. Which of our foundations are most relevant, and what should I check is current before I begin? List the specific documents I should pull into the project folder.
Tips for better AI output:
- Be honest about what is missing; the value is in surfacing gaps, not hiding them
- Use role-based owners (e.g. “Head of Comms”) so the index survives staff changes
- Revisit the index on a set cadence; an index that is itself out of date defeats the point
Human review checklist
- Everything has an owner: no foundation is listed without someone responsible for keeping it current
- Locations actually resolve: every link or location works and points to the live version
- Status is honest: stale and missing foundations are marked as such, not glossed over
- Gaps are prioritised: the missing foundations have an order and an owner, not just a flag
- Single source of truth: where duplicates exist, the index points to the one canonical version
- Review date set: the index has its own review cadence
- Usable by a newcomer: someone new could find your agreed positions from this alone
Example output
Comms Foundations Index, Lumen Trust (illustrative, core foundations only)
| Foundation | Document | Owner | Last reviewed | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positioning statement | /Comms/Foundations/positioning-2026 | Head of Comms | May 2026 | Current |
| Message house | /Comms/Foundations/message-house-2026 | Head of Comms | May 2026 | Current |
| Audience profiles | /Comms/Foundations/audiences | Senior Comms Officer | Jan 2025 | Stale |
| Brand voice and tone | — | — | — | Missing |
| AI use principles | /Comms/Foundations/ai-principles | Head of Comms | Jun 2026 | Current |
Top gap: brand voice and tone is undocumented, which makes voice consistency (and AI voice-checking) impossible. Priority: High, owned by Head of Comms, target end Q3.
Note: illustrative. Your index will reflect your own documents and gaps.
Related templates
- AI Use Principles - One of the core foundations this index should record
- Message House - Build the messaging foundation, then index it here
- Positioning Statement Generator - Define positioning before indexing it
- Comms Audience Profile - Build the audience foundation this index points to
Want your foundations built, indexed and kept current? Deploy Comms With AI sets them up and Manage Comms With AI keeps the index live.
Related templates
Need this implemented in your organisation?
Faur helps communications teams build frameworks, train teams, and embed consistent practices across channels.
Get in touch ↗